UK finance professionals predict World Cup to boost Brazil GDP by just 4% in next 2 years
- Finance professionals predict Brazil’s economy will grow by 4.1% over the next two years – compared to an average of 6.5% among past World Cup hosts
- Central and South American hosts lead the way with average 9.8% GDP gains – making the 1970s a golden age for post-World Cup economic growth
- Current holders Spain the only nation whose victory coincided with a downturn
- Olympics surpass the World Cup in terms of hosts’ subsequent GDP growth
-
1966 World Cup coincided with greater uplift for the UK economy than the 2012 Olympics
Finance professionals predict that this year’s FIFA World Cup in Brazil will boost the host nation’s economy by just 4.1% over the next two years, according to research by accountancy and finance recruiter Marks Sattin. This forecast leaves Brazil languishing outside the top ten in terms of the economic growth enjoyed by World Cup hosts since 1962, when comparable records began.
Marks Sattin’s research shows that World Cup host nations have seen an average GDP uplift of 6.5% in the two years following the event. Central and South American hosts have fared even better with tournaments in Argentina (1978), Mexico (1970 and 1986) and Chile (1962) preceding 9.8% GDP growth on average: more than twice the forecast for Brazil.
The fortunes of Mexico and Argentina made the 1970s a ‘golden age’ for post-World Cup economic growth that has yet to be bettered by subsequent hosts [see table below].
Rank | Host nation | World Cup GDP ($) | 2 year post-WC GDP ($) | % change |
1 | Argentina (1978) | 107,934 | 123,907 | 14.80% |
2 | Mexico (1970) | 247,022 | 277,408 | 12.30% |
3 | Chile (1962) | 20,756 | 22,613 | 8.90% |
4 | Korea (2002) | 755,643 | 812,703 | 7.60% |
5 | France (1998) | 1,842,358 | 1,973,040 | 7.10% |
6 | USA (1994) | 9,102,184 | 9,704,538 | 6.60% |
7 | England (1966) | 840,826 | 894,536 | 6.40% |
8 | South Africa (2010) | 289,661 | 307,312 | 6.10% |
9 | Germany (2006) | 2,868,605 | 2,994,469 | 4.40% |
10 | Japan (2002) | 4,335,932 | 4,513,082 | 4.10% |
11 | Brazil (2014)* | 1,185,944 | 1,234,568 | 4.10% |
12 | West Germany (1974) | 1,505,065 | 1,565,864 | 4.00% |
13 | Spain (1982) | 553,251 | 573,092 | 3.60% |
14 | Mexico (1986) | 499,765 | 515,379 | 3.10% |
15 | Italy (1990) | 1,450,660 | 1,485,266 | 2.40% |
Source: World Bank. GDP data is in constant 2005 U.S. dollars for historic comparison.
*Forecast by accountancy and finance professionals
World Cup victories coincide with greater growth
Brazil is the bookmakers’ favourite to win the 2014 tournament and Marks Sattin’s research shows that past World Cup winners have fared marginally better than the hosts in economic terms: experiencing 6.6% GDP growth on average.
Current holders Spain are the only nation whose victory coincided with a downturn in its economy, while Brazil’s last four victories preceded an average of 10.7% growth.
Rank | Winners | World Cup GDP ($) | 2 year post-WC GDP (4) | % change |
1 | Brazil (1970) | 227,933 | 284,253 | 24.70% |
2 | Argentina (1978) | 107,934 | 123,907 | 14.80% |
3 | France (1998) | 1,842,358 | 1,973,641 | 7.10% |
4 | West Germany (1990) | 2,216,250 | 2,373,999 | 7.10% |
5 | Brazil (2002) | 799,797 | 855,193 | 6.90% |
6 | Brazil (1994) | 666,695 | 711,109 | 6.70% |
7 | England (1966) | 840,826 | 894,536 | 6.40% |
8 | Italy (1982) | 1,158,766 | 1,210,132 | 4.40% |
9 | Brazil (1962) | 145,791 | 152,193 | 4.40% |
10 | West Germany (1974) | 1,505,066 | 1,565,865 | 4.00% |
11 | Italy (2006) | 1,825,554 | 1,834,816 | 0.50% |
12 | Argentina (1986) | 117,556 | 117,884 | 0.30% |
13 | Spain (2010) | 1,179,232 | 1,160,459 | -1.60% |
Source: World Bank. GDP data is in constant 2005 U.S. dollars for historic comparison.
Olympic hosts outdo World Cup counterparts in economic stakes
Marks Sattin’s research suggests Brazil will see greater benefit from Rio’s hosting of the next Olympic Games in 2016 than they will do from this year’s World Cup. Countries hosting the Olympics have typically outperformed their World Cup counterparts and experienced an average of 9.6% GDP growth in the ensuing two years.
This figure is boosted by the exceptional performances of China (2008), Tokyo (1964) and South Korea (1988) – but even discounting these three Asian economies, Olympic hosts have enjoyed an average GDP growth of 6.8%: 0.3% higher than World Cup hosts.
However, the UK economy bucks the overall trend with the 1966 World Cup heralding greater GDP growth (6.4%) than the 2012 London Olympics (5.3%).
Rank | Host (year) | Olympic GDP ($) | 2 year post-Olympic GDP ($) | Change |
1 | Beijing (2008) | 3,183,653 | 3,838,001 | 20.60% |
2 | Tokyo (1964) | 968,011 | 1,133,323 | 17.10% |
3 | Seoul (1988) | 322,610 | 375,897 | 16.50% |
4 | Mexico City (1968) | 224,272 | 247,022 | 10.10% |
5 | Atlanta (1996) | 9,704,538 | 10,591,235 | 9.10% |
6 | Athens (2004) | 234,723 | 253,297 | 7.90% |
7 | Los Angeles (1984) | 6,694,332 | 7,223,186 | 7.90% |
8 | Montreal (1976) | 498,226 | 535,835 | 7.50% |
9 | Sydney (2000) | 590,962 | 625,752 | 5.90% |
10 | Munich (1972) | 1,423,767 | 1,505,604 | 5.70% |
11 | London (2012)* | 2,392,406 | 2,518,080 | 5.30% |
12 | Barcelona (1992) | 756,222 | 766,258 | 1.30% |
Source: World Bank. GDP data is in constant 2005 U.S. dollars for historic comparison. Data for Moscow (1980) unavailable, London post-Olympic GDP based on the latest World Bank forecasts (April 2014).
Dave Way, Managing Director of Marks Sattin said,
“These findings suggest that hosting a major international tournament on the scale of the World Cup is invariably followed by a period of economic growth, heralding business expansion and new job opportunities.
“Accountancy and finance services are a core component of any international business, and the sheer scale of effort needed to capitalise on the worldwide exposure the event brings calls for a high level of technical and managerial skills.
“Brazil has experienced a rockier road than most in the lead-up to the World Cup, which is reflected in this cautious assessment of its growth potential. But with the Olympics on the horizon, it has the opportunity for even greater expansion from the one international sporting event that puts the World Cup in the shade.
“It’s interesting that UK economists have just as much reason as England football fans to hark back to the glory days of 1966. Brazil will be striving to relive the success of its revered 1970 team on the pitch, although few would bet on its chances of matching the economic uplift of 12.3% that Mexico enjoyed after hosting the event that year.”
Data Sources
*Survey among 264 accountants and finance professionals in May 2014
GDP data sourced from World Bank. Data is in constant 2005 U.S. dollars. Dollar figures for GDP are converted from domestic currencies using 2000 official exchange rates.
Signup to receive the latest discipline specific articles
Related articles
Teaser
Financial ServicesContent Type
Career Advice
25/11/24
Summary
Private equity (PE) ranks among the fastest growing areas in today’s finance world. With private equity value up by 36% in value compared to 2023, there’s arguably never been a better time to get
by
Neil Burton
Teaser
Finance & AccountingContent Type
Career Advice
08/11/24
Summary
The social, cultural, and economic shifts we’ve witnessed over the past number of years have resulted in a drastic, rapid evolution of the UK’s financial sector. To remain viable in these transit
by
Thomas Steel
Teaser
Finance & AccountingContent Type
General
08/11/24
Summary
From the advent of fintech and AI to post-pandemic, post-Brexit impacts, the UK’s finance sector continues to undergo rapid evolution. 2024 has also seen the finance world held to greater regulat
by
Conor Brooks
Related jobs
Salary:
£28,000 - £33,000 per annum
Location:
Leeds, West Yorkshire
Industry
Business Services
Qualification
None specified
Market
Financial Services
Salary
£30,000 - £35,000
Job Discipline
Tax
Contract Type:
Permanent
Description
.
Reference
BBBH181795
Expiry Date
01/01/01
Author
Aleksandra TaranovskajaAuthor
Aleksandra TaranovskajaSalary:
Up to £45,000 per annum
Location:
Birmingham, West Midlands
Industry
Business Services
Qualification
None specified
Market
Financial Services
Salary
£40,000 - £50,000
Job Discipline
Tax
Contract Type:
Permanent
Description
.
Reference
BBBH181972
Expiry Date
01/01/01
Author
Aleksandra TaranovskajaAuthor
Aleksandra TaranovskajaSalary:
Up to £55,000 per annum
Location:
London
Industry
Business Services
Qualification
None specified
Market
Financial Services
Salary
£50,000 - £60,000
Job Discipline
Tax
Contract Type:
Permanent
Description
.
Reference
BBBH181974
Expiry Date
01/01/01
Author
Aleksandra TaranovskajaAuthor
Aleksandra TaranovskajaSalary:
Up to £45,000 per annum
Location:
Manchester, Greater Manchester
Industry
Business Services
Qualification
None specified
Market
Financial Services
Salary
£40,000 - £50,000
Job Discipline
Tax
Contract Type:
Permanent
Description
.
Reference
BBBH182004
Expiry Date
01/01/01
Author
Aleksandra TaranovskajaAuthor
Aleksandra TaranovskajaSalary:
Up to £45,000 per annum
Location:
Reading, Berkshire
Industry
Business Services
Qualification
None specified
Market
Financial Services
Salary
£40,000 - £50,000
Job Discipline
Tax
Contract Type:
Permanent
Description
.
Reference
BBBH182006
Expiry Date
01/01/01
Author
Aleksandra TaranovskajaAuthor
Aleksandra TaranovskajaSalary:
£45,000 - £55,000 per annum
Location:
Leeds, West Yorkshire
Industry
Business Services
Qualification
None specified
Market
Financial Services
Salary
£50,000 - £60,000
Job Discipline
Tax
Contract Type:
Permanent
Description
.
Reference
BBBH182325
Expiry Date
01/01/01
Author
Aleksandra TaranovskajaAuthor
Aleksandra TaranovskajaSalary:
£48,000 - £50,000 per annum
Location:
Manchester, Greater Manchester
Industry
Business Services
Qualification
None specified
Market
Financial Services
Salary
£50,000 - £60,000
Job Discipline
Tax
Contract Type:
Permanent
Description
.
Reference
BBBH182562
Expiry Date
01/01/01
Author
Aleksandra TaranovskajaAuthor
Aleksandra TaranovskajaSalary:
£55,000 - £69,000 per annum
Location:
Manchester, Greater Manchester
Industry
Business Services
Qualification
None specified
Market
Financial Services
Salary
£60,000 - £70,000
Job Discipline
Tax
Contract Type:
Permanent
Description
.
Reference
BBBH182563
Expiry Date
01/01/01
Author
Aleksandra TaranovskajaAuthor
Aleksandra TaranovskajaSalary:
Up to £30,000 per annum
Location:
Leeds, West Yorkshire
Industry
Business Services
Qualification
None specified
Market
Financial Services
Salary
£30,000 - £35,000
Job Discipline
Tax
Contract Type:
Permanent
Description
.
Reference
BBBH180210
Expiry Date
01/01/01
Author
Aleksandra TaranovskajaAuthor
Aleksandra TaranovskajaSalary:
£55,000 - £60,000 per annum
Location:
Manchester, Greater Manchester
Industry
Business Services
Qualification
Fully qualified
Market
Financial Services
Salary
£60,000 - £70,000
Job Discipline
Tax
Contract Type:
Permanent
Description
.
Reference
BBBH182628
Expiry Date
01/01/01
Author
Aleksandra TaranovskajaAuthor
Aleksandra Taranovskaja